United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Jorene H. Florea, Defendant-appellant, 52 F.3d 322 (4th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseJorene H. Florea, Appellant Pro Se. Douglas Cannon, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, NC, for Appellee.
Before WIDENER and HALL, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Jorene H. Florea appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm.* United States v. Florea, No. CR-88-33-G; No. CA-92-392-2 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 2, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
We find the Claims 1, 2, and 4 were properly denied because they are successive under Rule 9(b) of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings in the United States District Courts. See Sanders v. United States, 373 U.S. 1, 15 (1963). Claim 3 was properly denied because Florea failed to object to this enhancement at sentencing and no plain error is apparent. See United States v. Davis, 954 F.2d 182 (4th Cir. 1992)
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
