Robert L. Griffin, Petitioner-appellant, v. Charles D. Marshall, Respondent-appellee, 51 F.3d 280 (9th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseBefore: SNEED, POOLE and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM**
Robert L. Griffin, a California state prisoner, appeals the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. He contends that the California Board of Prison Terms violated his due process rights by permitting him to be represented by only one attorney at his parole suitability hearing. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm for the reasons set forth in the district court's order filed September 14, 1993.
AFFIRMED.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4. Accordingly, Griffin's request for oral argument is denied
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
