United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Emery Harold Hall, Defendant-appellant, 51 F.3d 269 (4th Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 51 F.3d 269 (4th Cir. 1995) Submitted Feb. 28, 1995. Decided Mar. 27, 1995

Emery Harold Hall, appellant pro se. William Glenn Yarborough, III, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, SC, for appellee.

Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion to modify sentence. Our review of the record and the district court's order discloses that this appeal is without merit. As a Fed. R. Crim. P. 35 motion, it was untimely filed. As a motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. Sec. 3582(c) (2) (1988), it has no merit because no relevant sentencing guideline has been reduced. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.