Shula Ray, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Hilton Hotels, Corp., et Al, Defendant-appellee, 5 F.3d 539 (9th Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; No. CV-90-5971-HLH, Harry L. Hupp, District Judge, Presiding.
C.D. Cal.
AFFIRMED.
MEMORANDUM***
Before: BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI and BOGGS,** Circuit Judges.
Shula Ray appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Hilton Hotels and the Hotel Employees and Restaurant Union. We review de novo. Ashton v. Cory, 780 F.2d 816, 818 (9th Cir. 1986).
A. Ray failed to present sufficient evidence that the Union breached its duty of fair representation, Vaca v. Sipes, 386 U.S. 171, 190 (1967); summary judgment in favor of the Union was therefore warranted.
B. As the district court correctly granted summary judgment in favor of the Union, Ray was not entitled to proceed against Hilton Hotels for a breach of its collective bargaining agreement. Id. at 185-86; Moore v. Bechtel Power Corp., 840 F.2d 634, 638 (9th Cir. 1988).
AFFIRMED
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4
The Honorable Danny J. Boggs, United States Circuit Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
