United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Felix D. Diaz, A/k/a Papo, Defendant-appellant, 48 F.3d 1217 (4th Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 48 F.3d 1217 (4th Cir. 1995) Submitted Feb. 28, 1995. Decided March 7, 1995

Felix D. Diaz, Appellant Pro Se.

David Scott Lavine, Perry Scott Bechky, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, VA, for Appellee.

Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Diaz, Nos. CR-91-322-A and CA-94-519 (E.D. Va. Aug. 8, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.