Stamford Hotel, a Texas Limited Partnership, by Its Managinggeneral Partner, Csh-stamford Hotel Limited Partnership, Atexas Limited Partnership; 42nd West 48th Street Limitedpartnership, a Texas Limited Partnership, by Its Managinggeneral Partner, Csh-48th Street Limited Partnership, Atexas Limited Partnership; 400 Madison Avenue Limitedpartnership, a Texas Limited Partnership, by Its Managinggeneral Partner, Csh-madison Avenue Limited Partnership, Adelaware Limited Partnership, Plaintiffs-appellants, v. Prudential Securities, Inc., a Delaware Corporation;prudential Securities Group, Inc., a Delawarecorporation; Prudential-bacheproperties, Inc., a Delawarecorporation,defendants-appellees, 46 F.3d 1145 (9th Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 46 F.3d 1145 (9th Cir. 1995) Submitted: Oct. 6, 1994. *Decided: Jan. 13, 1995

Before: D.W. NELSON, NORRIS, and BOGGS** , Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM*** 

The facts and legal issues in this case are essentially identical to those set forth and decided in 680 Fifth Avenue Assocs. v. Prudential Securities, Inc., No. 93-55458, issued today.

On the authority of that memorandum, the decision of the district court dismissing the complaint in this case is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); Ninth Circuit Rule 34-4

 **

The Honorable Danny J. Boggs, United States Circuit Judge for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation

 ***

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or used by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.