James Gilbert, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Richard Lanham, Sr., Commissioner; Earl D. Beshears,warden; B. Irvin, Security Chief; Officerjohnson; John Peterson, Defendants-appellees, 46 F.3d 1123 (4th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseJames Gilbert, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Lawrence Paul Fletcher-Hill, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, MD, for Appellees.
Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinions discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Gilbert v. Lanham, No. CA-94-1174-S (D. Md. May 18, 1994; Aug. 24, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate rials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
