Robert E. Van Ordstrand, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Daniel Abelman, et al., Defendants,andfederal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Defendant-intervenor-appellee, 45 F.3d 438 (9th Cir. 1994)
Annotate this CaseBefore: TANG, REINHARDT, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
ORDER**
Robert E. Van Ordstrand's interlocutory appeal seeks to set aside the district court's Order of Cancellation of Lis Pendens on land which had been acquired by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as receiver for New Bank of New England, N.A. The FDIC has requested that we take judicial notice of the sale of the "Stub Tract" upon which the lis pendens was recorded, and dismiss the appeal as moot.
Assuming we would otherwise have jurisdiction to hear Van Ordstrand's appeal, the sole issue has become moot. Pursuant to the FDIC's unopposed request, we take judicial notice of the fact that the land subject to lis pendens was sold after the cancellation order was recorded. Van Ordstrand did not obtain a stay of the district court's order.
An appeal becomes moot upon the occurrence of events that prevent the appellate court from granting any effective relief. Matter of Combined Metals Reduction Co., 557 F.2d 179, 187 (9th Cir. 1977). As no stay was obtained, and the land has been sold, a reversal of the district court cancellation order would not provide a basis for meaningful relief. Van Ordstrand's appeal is, therefore, moot.
DISMISSED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.