United States of America, Plaintiff Appellee, v. Charles G. Dicola, Defendant Appellant, 45 F.3d 428 (4th Cir. 1994)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, Senior District Judge.
Charles G. DiCola, appellant Pro Se.
Gary Patrick Jordan, Office of the United States Atty., Baltimore, MD; Lawrence McDade, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for appellee.
D. Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL, MURNAGHAN and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion and his motion seeking recusal of the district court judge. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. DiCola, Nos. CR-91-379-HAR; CA-93-1636-HAR (D. Md. Dec. 17, 1993). Appellant's request to expedite is now moot and is denied for that reason. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
