William Bartholomew Prechtl, Iii, Plaintiff Appellant, v. John Mills, Inmate Relations Coordinator; Phoebe Wilson,inmate Relations Coordinator; Stanley R. Witkowski, Warden;wayne Chastine, Investigator, Each of the Perrycorrectional Institution and Each in Their Official Andindividual Capacities, Defendants Appellees, 43 F.3d 1467 (4th Cir. 1994)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-92-1996-8-17AJ)
William Bartholomew Prechtl, III, Appellant Pro Se. Jack Martin Telle, DOYLE & O'ROURKE, Anderson, SC, for Appellees.
D.S.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before RUSSELL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Prechtl v. Mills, No. CA-92-1996-8-17AJ (D.S.C. May 27, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
