United States of America, Plaintiff Appellee, v. Mary W. Neese, Defendant Appellant, 37 F.3d 1497 (4th Cir. 1994)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Dennis Raymond Knapp, Senior District Judge. (CA-90-995-2)
Mary W. Neese, Appellant Pro Se.
Carol A. Casto, Asst. U.S. Atty., Charleston, WV, for Appellee.
S.D.W. Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's orders granting summary judgment for the United States in this trespass action and awarding $960 in damages. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* United States v. Neese, No. CA-90-995-2 (S.D.W. Va. Sept. 9, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
We note that in its order granting summary judgment to the United States on the issue of Appellant's liability, the district court inadvertently stated that liability was based on W. Va.Code Sec. 61-3-48(a). In fact, liability was based on W. Va.Code Sec. 61-3-48a (1992)
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
