Andrew Frank Karacsonyi, Plaintiff Appellant, v. Tom Owens, Defendant Appellee, 36 F.3d 1092 (4th Cir. 1994)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 36 F.3d 1092 (4th Cir. 1994) Submitted: July 6, 1994Decided: September 26, 1994

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-02-381-CRT-H)

Andrew Frank Karacsonyi, Appellant Pro Se.

Barbara Dickerson Kocher, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment for Appellee in this Bivens action.*  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Karacsonyi v. Owens, No. CA-02-381-CRT-H (E.D.N.C. Mar. 18, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 *

Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.