Robert Leon Buckner; Gerald Davis Fuller; James Calvertmcgee; Jeffrey Kokosinski; William Howard Mobley; Kennethhebb; Charles Robinson; Christopher Mead; Cajetan Ohakwe;kofi Genfi; Gregory Wilson; Douglas Weatherly; Matthewporter; Richard Myers; Anthony Burwell; Arnold Morris;tyrone Hunter; Bernard Brooks; David Sampson; Reynauldwatkins; Hatratico Smith; Jeremiah Handy; David Cosner;charles Rogers; Joseph Evans; Jim Sheppard; Ottisrussell; Robert Blankenship; Troy West; Eddie Williams;juan Hicks; Michael Elbert; Tracy Williams; Jarvisbriscoe; James Hogan; John Harris-bey; Talbot Tabron;luis Merced; Arthur Murray; Brian Matthews; Craig Simms;michael Ferguson; Anthony Sye; Galen Hyman; Lawrencesherman; Bernard Jones; Bryant Collins; David Richardson;maurice Yancy; Todd Winkler; Robert Blannon; Kevinfarrow; Christopher Swanson; Reynard Wilson; Mark Carter;ricky Hones; Major James Edwards; Glen Giles; Edwardcammarata; Timothy Saunders; Walter Clark; Darrell A.bowman; Lodrick Cunningham; Dave Thomas; Daniel Banks;demond Williams; Allen Harmon; Lawrence Carter; Vernonmiddleton; Gary Ireland; Donald Rankin; Gary Wignall;ravon Battle; Leonard Thomas; Alan Weaver; Williamrandon; James Newell; Robert Bell; Antonio Beverly;william Campbell; Raymond Bollier; Bobby Singley; Scottschultz; John Caldwell; Ronald Saunders; Bobby Pruitt;maurice Lively; Reginald Mcknight; James Barkley; Pauldavis; Clarence Coleman; Mckinley Frazier; Alex Robinson;ralph Ashe; Gary Brown; Charles Getner; Christopherpruitt; Anthony L. Capers; Michael Meredith; Adambandiere; Larry Hunter; William Sly; Sidney Roy;alphonso Bennett; William Hall; Larry Smith; Donaldhenderson; Alvin Thomas, Plaintiffs Appellants, v. Earl Beshears; Supervisor, Mail Room; Kathleen S. Green;richard A. Lanham; Melanie C. Pereira; Bellatlantic Corporation, Defendants Appellees, 34 F.3d 1066 (4th Cir. 1994)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 34 F.3d 1066 (4th Cir. 1994) Submitted: July 19, 1994
Decided: August 4, 1994

Before HALL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Buckner v. Beshears, No. CA-93-3939-S (D. Md. Dec. 14, 1993; Dec. 29, 1993; Jan. 7, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.