United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Renee Alberta Stoner, Defendant-appellant, 33 F.3d 60 (9th Cir. 1994)
Annotate this CaseBefore: O'SCANNLAIN AND NELSON, T.G., Circuit Judges, and Merhige, Senior District Judge.2
MEMORANDUM3
Stoner appeals from the district court's order of December 4, 1992, denying her motion to suppress evidence seized during the warrantless search of her car. On February 1, 1993, appellant entered into a conditional guilty plea agreement charging her in two counts with using a communication facility in committing a narcotic felony in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 843(b).
Appellant argues that her Fourth Amendment rights were violated when, after being stopped for a traffic violation, she and her passengers were questioned by the police. Appellant's detention was reasonable, and no Fourth Amendment violation occurred. Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 21 (1968); United States v. Holtzman, 871 F.2d 1496 (9th Cir. 1989); United States v. Bautista, 684 F.2d 1286 (9th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 (1983). Appellant also contends that the police lacked probable cause to search her car. Based on the totality of the circumstances, the police had probable cause to believe that contraband or evidence was contained in the car. California v. Acevedo, 500 U.S. 565, 580 (1991).
AFFIRMED.
This case is appropriate for submission on the briefs and without oral argument per Fed.R.App. 34(a) and 9th Cir.R. 34-4
The Honorable Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Virginia, sitting by designation
This disposition is not suitable for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.