Drayton M. Smith, Petitioner-appellant, v. Parker Evatt, Commissioner, South Carolina Department Ofcorrections; T. Travis Medlock, Attorney Generalof South Carolina, Respondents-appellees, 32 F.3d 563 (4th Cir. 1994)
Annotate this CaseBefore HALL, LUTTIG and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Drayton M. Smith, Appellant Pro Se.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Smith v. Evatt, No. CA-94-396-3-6BD (D.S.C. Feb. 28, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
