William B. Prowell, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Gary L. Henman, Warden, U.s.p., Leavenworth, Defendant-appellee, 28 F.3d 113 (10th Cir. 1994)
Annotate this CaseBefore MOORE, ANDERSON and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
ORDER AND JUDGMENT1
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
The judgment of the district court was predicated upon findings of fact supported by the record. We therefore AFFIRM for the reasons stated by the district court in its order of July 30, 1993. Appellant's motion for leave to file without prepayment of fees is GRANTED.
The mandate shall issue forthwith.
This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of the court's General Order filed November 29, 1993. 151 F.R.D. 470
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
