United States of America, Plaintiff Appellee, v. Arthur Lee Hook, Defendant Appellant, 27 F.3d 564 (4th Cir. 1994)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CR-92-89)
Arthur Lee Hook, appellant pro se.
Eric William Ruschky, Asst. U.S. Atty., Columbia, S.C., for appellee.
D.S.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion to clarify his sentence. Our review of the record and the district court's order discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Hook, No. CR-92-89 (D.S.C. Aug. 3, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
