Burton H. Wolfe, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Earl R. Franklin, et al., Defendants-appellees, 26 F.3d 136 (9th Cir. 1994)

 Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 26 F.3d 136 (9th Cir. 1994) Argued and Submitted April 12, 1994. Decided May 25, 1994

Before: FLETCHER, FERGUSON and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM* 

Burton Wolfe challenges the district court's dismissal of this action for failure to state a claim. Wolfe raised all of the claims in this suit in the companion case, Chan v. Miller, No. 92-16139. We affirm the district court judgment for the reasons we articulated in our memorandum disposition in Chan.

We also affirm the district court's denial of Wolfe's motion to remand to state court. Any state law claims are preempted by Sec. 301(a) of the Labor Management Relations Act. 29 U.S.C. § 185(a) (1988). See Chan at 6.

The district court judgment is AFFIRMED.

 *

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.