Notice: Eighth Circuit Rule 28a(k) Governs Citation of Unpublished Opinions and Provides That No Party May Cite an Opinion Not Intended for Publication Unless the Cases Are Related by Identity Between the Parties or the Causes of Action.united States of America, Appellee, v. Dennis G. Mauch, Appellant, 26 F.3d 127 (8th Cir. 1994)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit - 26 F.3d 127 (8th Cir. 1994) Submitted: May 24, 1994. Filed: June 17, 1994

Before McMILLIAN, WOLLMAN, and MAGILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.


Dennis G. Mauch appeals his 97-month sentence imposed by the district court1  after he pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a) (1) and 846. On appeal, Mauch's counsel moved to withdraw and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), raising issues regarding the district court's acceptance of Mauch's guilty plea, the calculation of Mauch's Guidelines offense level, and the length of the sentence. Mauch did not file a supplemental brief although he was given an opportunity to do so. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude the issues raised by Mauch's counsel do not warrant reversal and find no other nonfrivolous issues for appeal. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-82 (1988).

Accordingly, we grant counsel's motion to withdraw and affirm the district court's judgment.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

 1

The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.