Lawrence Woods, Plaintiff Appellant, v. Michael A. Sheely, Defendant Appellee, 25 F.3d 1042 (4th Cir. 1994)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 25 F.3d 1042 (4th Cir. 1994) Submitted: May 24, 1994. Decided: June 13, 1994

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, District Judge. (CA-93-260)

Lawrence Woods, Appellant Pro Se.

E. Fitzgerald Parnell, III, Weinstein & Sturges, P.A., Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

W.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing Appellant's complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Woods v. Sheely, No. CA-93-260 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 3, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.