Notice: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 States Unpublished Opinions May Be Cited Only in Related Cases.augusto Serna, Petitioner, Appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent, Appellee, 25 F.3d 1037 (1st Cir. 1994)
Annotate this CaseAPPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE [Hon. Shane Devine, Senior U.S. District Judge ]
Augusto Serna on brief pro se.
Paul M. Gagnon, United States Attorney, and Peter E. Papps, First Assistant United States Attorney, on Motion for Summary Disposition, for appellee.
D. N.H.
AFFIRMED.
Before Selya, Cyr and Boudin, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam.
We affirm the denial of appellant's Sec. 2255 petition for the reasons stated by the district court in its November 23, 1993 order. The questions concerning Guillermo and Munoz, to which appellant responded in the negative, were not evidence and had no effect on the sentence.
Affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
