Adrian Salmon, Petitioner-appellant, v. M. Carillo; Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, Respondent-appellee, 222 F.3d 1046 (9th Cir. 2000)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 222 F.3d 1046 (9th Cir. 2000) Filed August 2, 2000

D.C. No. CV-95-03554-DT, Central District of California

Before: Otto R. Skopil, Jr., Stephen Reinhardt, and Susan P. Graber, Circuit Judges.

AMENDED ORDER

The order filed June 28, 2000 is amended as follows: In light of the opinion of the United States Supreme Court in Roe v. Flores-Ortega, 120 S. Ct. 1029 (2000), it is ORDERED that this case be remanded to the district court for an evidentiary hearing on Petitioner's plea-related and appeal-related ineffectiveness of counsel claims. With this amendment, the petition for rehearing is denied.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.