United States of America, Petitioner-appellant, v. Donald M. Schindler, Respondent-appellee, 21 F.3d 1118 (9th Cir. 1994)

 Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 21 F.3d 1118 (9th Cir. 1994) Submitted April 7, 1994. *Decided April 11, 1994

Before: BROWNING, PREGERSON, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges

ORDER** 

The IRS petition for enforcement in this case meets minimal requirements. See United States v. Abrahams, 905 F.2d 1276, 1280 & n. 3 (9th Cir. 1990). The judgment of the district court is therefore reversed and the case remanded for issuance of an order requiring Schindler to show cause why the summons should not be enforced. See United States v. Gilleran, 992 F.2d 232, 233-34 (9th Cir. 1993).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

 *

The panel finds this case appropriate for submission without oral argument pursuant to 9th Cir.R. 34-4 and Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or for the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.