Garland Lee Giles, Petitioner-appellant, v. Edward W. Murray, Director, Virginia Department Ofcorrections, Respondent-appellee, 2 F.3d 1149 (4th Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Richard B. Kellam, Senior District Judge. (CA-92-70-2)
Garland Lee Giles, Appellant Pro Se.
Robert Quentin Harris, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
E.D. Va.
DISMISSED.
Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Garland Lee Giles appeals from the district court's order denying his Motion for Relief from Judgment (denying habeas corpus relief), pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Giles v. Murray, No. CA-92-70-2 (E.D. Va. Apr. 26, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
