United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Kenneth D. Bendickson, Defendant-appellant, 19 F.3d 30 (9th Cir. 1994)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 19 F.3d 30 (9th Cir. 1994) Submitted Feb. 24, 1994. *Decided March 3, 1994

Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM** 

Kenneth D. Bendickson appeals his conviction imposed following entry of an unconditional guilty plea to attempt to manufacture methamphetamine and aiding and abetting, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a) (1), and 18 U.S.C. § 2, and use of a weapon in narcotics trafficking, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Bendickson's counsel submitted a brief stating that he finds no arguable issues for review and filed a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988), discloses no issues for review. Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.