United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Meir Avraham Duke, Defendant-appellant, 19 F.3d 12 (4th Cir. 1994)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 19 F.3d 12 (4th Cir. 1994) Submitted Dec. 16, 1993. Decided March 1, 1994

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frank A. Kaufman, Senior District Judge. (CR-90-135-K, CA-93-527-K)

Meir Avraham Duke, appellant pro se.

Katharine Jacobs Armentrout, Asst. U.S. Atty., Baltimore, MD, for appellee.

D. Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.*  United States v. Duke, No. CR-90-135-K; CA-93-527-K (D. Md. Sept. 13, 1993). Because the appeal is no longer pending, Duke's motion for release pending appeal is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 *

We grant Duke's motion to enlarge his informal brief

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.