79 Fair Empl.prac.cas. (bna) 1770,75 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 45,754julie Deffenbaugh Williams, Plaintiff-appellee Cross-appellant, v. Wal-mart Stores, Inc., et al., Defendants,wal-mart Stores, Inc., Defendant-appellant Cross-appellee, 169 F.3d 215 (5th Cir. 1999)
Annotate this CaseMark C. Brodeur, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee Cross-Appellant.
Jimmy Preston Wrotenbery, Kevin D. Jewell, Magenheim, Bateman, Robinson, Wrotenbery & Helfand, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant Cross-Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas; Eldon B. Mahon, Judge.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion Sept. 24, 1998, 5 Cir., 1998, 156 F.3d 581).
Before POLITZ, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHE, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.*
BY THE COURT:
A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
Chief Judge King is recused and did not participate in this decision
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
