Eliseo C. Duran, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Joseph R. Greene, District Director of the 19th District Ofthe United States Immigration and Naturalization Service;immigration & Naturalization Service, United Statesdepartment of Justice, Defendants-appellees, 166 F.3d 1220 (10th Cir. 1999)
Annotate this CasePlaintiff Eliseo C. Duran appeals from the district court's judgment upholding a decision of the INS forfeiting an immigration bond upon which Plaintiff was the obligor. We have reviewed the parties' briefs, and carefully examined the entire record on appeal. Based upon our review of the record, we conclude that the district court properly granted summary judgment in favor of Defendants, and affirm substantially for the reasons set forth in the magistrate judge's recommendation on the parties' cross motions for summary judgment, and the district judge's subsequent order adopting that recommendation.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously to honor the parties' request for a decision on the briefs without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1. (G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument
This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
