Jefri Aalmuhammed, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Spike Lee; Forty Acres and a Mule Filmworks, Inc.; by Anymeans Necessary Cinema, Inc.; Warner Brothers, a Division Oftime-warner Entertainment Lp; Victor Company of Japan, Ltd.;largo International Nv; Largo Entertainment, Defendants-appellees, 162 F.3d 1167 (9th Cir. 1998)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 162 F.3d 1167 (9th Cir. 1998) Argued and Submitted May 5, 1998. Decided Oct. 29, 1998

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Central District of California J. Spencer Letts, District Judge, Presiding.

Before CANBY, NOONAN and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

We are compelled to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The order and judgment appealed from says "The Court may amend or amplify this order with a more specific statement of the grounds for its decision." We held in National Distrib., Agency v. Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co., 117 F.3d 432 (9th Cir. 1997), that the identical language in another judgment by the same district judge prevented finality because "the court left open the possibility that the court might change its ruling" and no separate final judgment was subsequently entered. We are unable to distinguish the two cases.

Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED. Because this panel has prepared and heard argument on the merits, any subsequent appeal of this case shall be referred to this panel for consideration. The district court is requested to "amend or amplify" its order, or enter final judgment without amendment or amplification, within 90 days.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.