Billy Earl Clayton, Plaintiff-appellant, v. U.s Probation Office; U.S. Parole Commission; T.r. Kindt;k. Sullivan, Case Manager, Defendants-appellees, 16 F.3d 415 (10th Cir. 1994)
Annotate this CaseBefore SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, MCKAY, and BALDOCK, Circuit Judges.
ORDER AND JUDGMENT1
SEYMOUR
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
After carefully reviewing the record and the arguments raised in this case, we are not persuaded that the magistrate judge erred in his Report and Recommendation. Rec., vol. I, doc. 26. Plaintiff failed to establish a violation of his constitutional rights. The district court adopted the report, granted defendants' motion for summary judgment, and dismissed part of the claim as moot. Id. at doc. 29.
WE AFFIRM the district court's decision substantially for the reasons set forth in the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation.
This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of the court's General Order filed November 22, 1993
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
