William E. Cooper, Petitioner-appellant, v. Michael v. Pugh, Respondent-appellee, 153 F.3d 726 (10th Cir. 1998)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit - 153 F.3d 726 (10th Cir. 1998) July 13, 1998

Before PORFILIO, KELLY, and HENRY, Circuit Judges.


ORDER AND JUDGMENT* 

JOHN C. PORFILIO, C.J.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously to grant the parties' request for a decision on the briefs without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(f) and 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

The district court properly concluded appellant failed to demonstrate theinadequacy of the remedy available to him under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. We AFFIRM for the reasons stated by the district court in its order of dismissal. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

 *

This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.