153 F.3d US Court of Appeals Cases

Share |
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation; Lorillard Tobaccocompany; Philip Morris, Incorporated; Rjreynolds Tobacco Company, Plaintiffs-appellants,andcoyne Beahm, Incorporated; Liggett Group, Incorporated, Plaintiffs, v. Food & Drug Administration; David A. Kessler, M.d.,commissioner of Food and Drugs, Defendants-appellees.attorneys General of the State of Minnesota; State Ofalaska; State of Arizona; State of Arkansas; State Ofcolorado; State of Connecticut; State of Florida; Stateof Hawaii; State of Illinois; State of Indiana; State Ofiowa; State of Louisiana; State of Kansas; State Ofmaine; State of Maryland; State of Massachusetts; Stateof Michigan; State of Mississippi; State of Missouri;state of Montana; State of Nevada; State of New Hampshire;state of New Jersey; State of New Mexico; State of Newyork; State of North Dakota; State of Ohio; State Ofoklahoma; State of Oregon; State of Pennsylvania; Stateof Rhode Island; State of South Dakota; State of Texas;state of Utah; State of Vermont; State of Washington;state of West Virginia; State of Wisconsin; the City Andcounty of San Francisco; Public Citizen; the Americanacademy of Pediatrics; American Cancer Society; Americancollege of Preventive Medicine; American Heart Association;american Lung Association; American Medical Association;american Medical Women's Association; American Publichealth Association; American Society of Addiction Medicine;the Hmo Group; National Association of Elementary Schoolprincipals; National Association of Secondary Schoolprincipals; National Center for Tobacco-free Kids; Stateof Kentucky; Washington Legal Foundation ("wlf"); Marioandretti; Don Garlits; al Unser; Rusty Wallace; Caleyarborough; Richard Burr, Cass Ballenger, Howard Coble,united States Representatives, Lauch Faircloth, Unitedstates Senator, Amici Curiae.coyne Beahm, Incorporated; Brown & Williamson Tobaccocorporation; Philip Morris, Incorporated; Rj Reynoldstobacco Company; National Association of Conveniencestores; Acme Retail, Incorporated; United States Tobaccocompany; Conwood Company, Lp; National Tobacco Company,lp; Pinkerton Tobacco Company; Swisher International,incorporated; Central Carolina Grocers, Incorporated; J.t.davenport, Incorporated; North Carolina Tobaccodistributors Committee, Incorporated; the Americanadvertising Federation; American Association of Advertisingagencies; Association of National Advertisers,incorporated; Magazine Publishers of America; the Outdooradvertising Association of America, Incorporated; Point Ofpurchase Advertising Institute; Lorillard Tobacco Company,plaintiffs-appellees,andliggett Group, Incorporated, Plaintiff, v. Food & Drug Administration; David A. Kessler, M.d.,commissioner of Food and Drugs, Defendants-appellants.attorneys General of the State of Minnesota; State Ofalaska; State of Arizona; State of Arkansas; State Ofcolorado; State of Connecticut; State of Florida; Stateof Hawaii; State of Illinois; State of Indiana; State Ofiowa; State of Louisiana; State of Kansas; State Ofmaine; State of Maryland; State of Massachusetts; Stateof Michigan; State of Mississippi; State of Missouri;state of Montana; State of Nevada; State of New Hampshire;state of New Jersey; State of New Mexico; State of Newyork; State of North Dakota; State of Ohio; State Ofoklahoma; State of Oregon; State of Pennsylvania; Stateof Rhode Island; State of South Dakota; State of Texas;state of Utah; State of Vermont; State of Washington;state of West Virginia; State of Wisconsin; City Andcounty of San Francisco; Public Citizen; the Americanacademy of Pediatrics; American Cancer Society; Americancollege of Preventive Medicine; American Heart Association;american Lung Association; American Medical Association;american Medical Women's Association; American Publichealth Association; American Society of Addiction Medicine;the Hmo Group; National Association of Elementary Schoolprincipals; National Association of Secondary Schoolprincipals; National Center for Tobacco-free Kids; Stateof Kentucky; Washington Legal Foundation ("wlf"); Marioandretti; Don Garlits; al Unser;
Citation: 153 F.3d 155
Court: 4th Circuit Court of Appeals
Date: August 14, 1998
Citation: 153 F.3d 16
Court: 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals
Date: August 6, 1998
Citation: 153 F.3d 190
Court: 5th Circuit Court of Appeals
Date: August 25, 1998
Southwestern Bell Telephone Company; Petitioner,southern New England Telephone Company; Texas Office Ofpublic Utility Counsel; United States Telephoneassociation; Ameritech Corporation; U S West, Inc.; Ruraltelephone Coalition; Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company;gte Service Corporation; Gte Alaska, Incorporated; Gtearkansas Incorporated; Gte California, Incorporated; Gteflorida, Incorporated; Gte Midwest, Incorporated; Gtesouth, Incorporated; Gte Southwest, Incorporated; Gtenorth, Incorporated; Gte Hawaiian Telephone Company,incorporated; Gte West Coast, Incorporated; Contel Ofminnesota, Inc.; Contel of the South, Inc.; Missouripublic Service Commission; Gte Northwest, Incorporated;pacific Bell; Nevada Bell, Intervenors on Appeal. v. Federal Communications Commission; United States Ofamerica, Respondents.association for Local Telecommunications Services; Americantelephone and Telegraph Company; Telecommunicationsresellers Association; the Competition Policy Institute;information Technology Association of America; Nationalcable Television Association, Inc.; Internet Accesscoalition; Ad Hoc Telecommunications Users Committee;worldcom, Inc.; Sprint Corporation; Telco Communicationsgroup, Inc.; Excel Telecommunications, Inc.; Bell Atlantictelephone Companies; Time Warner Communications Holdings,inc.; Mci Telecommunications Corporation; Ny Telephone;new England Telephone and Telegraph Company, Intervenors on Appeal.america's Carriers Telecommunication Association,intervenors on Appeal,commercial Internet Exchange Association, Amicus Curiae.southwestern Bell Telephone Company; Petitioner,ameritech Corporation; Time Warner Communications Holdings;us Telephone Association; Gte Service Corporation; Gtealaska, Incorporated; Gte Arkansas, Incorporated; Gtecalifornia, Incorporated; Gte Florida, Incorporated; Gtemidwest, Incorporated; Gte South, Incorporated; Gtesouthwest, Incorporated; Benjamin Wayne Mccoin, Inc.; Gtenorthwest, Incorporated; Gte Hawaiian Telephone Company,incorporated; Gte West Coast, Incorporated; Contel Ofminnesota, Inc.; Contel of the South, Inc.; Associationfor Local Telecommunications Services; Bellatlantic-maryland, Inc.; Bell Atlantic-washington, D.c.,inc.; Bell Atlantic-west Virginia, Inc.; Bell Atlantic-newjersey, Inc.; Bell Atlantic-delaware, Inc.; Bellatlantic-pennsylvania, Inc.; Bell Atlantic-virginia, Inc.;new York Telephone Company; New England Telephone Andtelegraph Company; Independent Telephone Andtelecommunications Alliance, Intervenors on Appeal. v. Federal Communications Commission; United States Ofamerica, Respondents.american Telephone and Telegraph Company;telecommunications Resellers Association; Mcitelecommunications Corporation, Lbc Communications, Inc.;worldcom, Inc.; Competitive Telecommunications Association,intervenors on Appeal
Citation: 153 F.3d 520
Court: 8th Circuit Court of Appeals
Date: June 5, 1998
Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, Petitioner,southern New England Telephone Company; Texas Office Ofpublic Utility Counsel; United States Telephoneassociation; Ameritech Corporation; U S West, Inc.; Ruraltelephone Coalition; Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company;gte Service Corporation; Gte Alaska, Incorporated; Gtearkansas, Incorporated; Gte California, Incorporated; Gteflorida, Incorporated; Gte Midwest, Incorporated; Gtesouth Incorporated; Gte Southwest, Incorporated; Gte North,incorporated; Gte Hawaiian Telephone Company, Incorporated;gte West Coast, Incorporated; Contel of Minnesota, Inc.;contel of the South, Inc.; Missouri Public Servicecommission; Gte Northwest, Incorporated; Pacific Bell;nevada Bell, Intervenors on Appeal, v. Federal Communications Commission; United States of America,respondents,association for Local Telecommunications Services; Americantelephone and Telegraph Company; Telecommunicationsresellers Association; the Competition Policy Institute;information Technology Association of America; Nationalcable Television Association, Inc.; Internet Accesscoalition; Ad Hoc Telecommunications Users Committee;worldcom, Inc.; Sprint Corporation; Teleco Communicationsgroup, Inc.; Excel Telecommunications, Inc.; Bell Atlantictelephone Companies; Time Warner Communications Holdings,inc.; Mci Telecommunications Corporation; New Yorktelephone; New England Telephone and Telegraph Company,intervenors on Appeal,america's Carriers Telecommunication Association,intervenors on Appeal,commercial Internet Exchange Association, Amicus Curiae.gte Midwest, Incorporated, Petitioner,the Southern New England Telephone Company; U S West, Inc.;ameritech Corporation; Texas Office of Public Utilitycounsel; United States Telephone Association; Southwesternbell Telephone Company; Rural Telephone Coalition;cincinnati Bell Telephone Company; Missouri Public Servicecommission; Pacific Bell; Nevada Bell, Intervenors on Appeal, v. Federal Communications Commission; United States of America,respondents,american Telephone and Telegraph Company;telecommunications Resellers Association; the Competitionpolicy Institute; Excel Telecommunications, Inc.; Telcocommunications Group, Inc.; Sprint Corporation; Worldcom,inc.; Ad Hoc Telecommunications Users Committee; Internetaccess Coalition; National Cable Television Association,inc.; Information Technology Association of America;association for Local Telecommunications Services; Bellatlantic Telephone Companies; Time Warner Communicationsholdings, Inc.; Mci Telecommunications Corporation; Newyork Telephone; New England Telephone and Telegraphcompany, Intervenors on Appeal,america's Carriers Telecommunication Association,intervenors on Appeal,commercial Internet Exchange Association, Amicus Curiae.bell Atlantic-virginia, Incorporated, Petitioner,southern New England Telephone Company; Ameritechcorporation; Texas Office of Public Utility Counsel; Unitedstates Telephone Association; Southwestern Bell Telephonecompany; U S West, Inc.; Rural Telephone Coalition; Bellatlantic Telephone Companies; Cincinnati Bell Telephonecompany; Gte Service Corporation; Gte Alaska, Incorporated;gte Arkansas, Incorporated; Gte California, Incorporated;gte Florida, Incorporated; Gte Midwest, Incorporated; Gtesouth, Incorporated; Gte Southwest, Incorporated; Gtenorth, Incorporated; Gte Northwest, Incorporated; Gtehawaiian Telephone Company, Incorporated; Gte West Coast,incorporated; Contel of Minnesota, Inc.; Contel of Thesouth, Inc.; Missouri Public Service Commission; Pacificbell; Nevada Bell, Intervenors on Appeal, v. Federal Communications Commission; United States of America,respondents,the Competition Policy Institute; America's Carrierstelecommunication Association; Excel Telecommunications,inc.; Telco Communications Group, Inc.; Sprintcorporation; Worldcom, Inc.; Ad Hoc Telecommunicationsusers Committee; Internet Access Coalition; National Cabletelevision Association, Inc.; Information Technologyassociation of America; American Telephone and Telegraphcompany; Association for Local Telecommunications Services;teleco
Citation: 153 F.3d 523
Court: 8th Circuit Court of Appeals
Date: August 19, 1998
Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, Petitioner,ameritech Corporation; Time Warner Communications Holdings;us Telephone Association; Gte Service Corporation; Gtealaska, Incorporated; Gte Arkansas, Incorporated; Gtecalifornia, Incorporated; Gte Florida, Incorporated; Gtemidwest, Incorporated; Gte South, Incorporated; Gtesouthwest, Incorporated; Gte North, Incorporated; Gtenorthwest, Incorporated; Gte Hawaiian Telephone Company,incorporated; Gte West Coast, Incorporated; Contel Ofminnesota, Inc.; Contel of the South, Inc.; Associationfor Local Telecommunications Services; Bellatlantic-maryland, Inc.; Bell Atlantic-washington, D.c.,inc.; Bell Atlantic-west Virginia, Inc.; Bell Atlantic-newjersey, Inc.; Bell Atlantic-delaware, Inc.; Bellatlantic-pennsylvania, Inc.; Bell Atlantic-virginia, Inc.;new York Telephone Company; New England Telephone Andtelegraph Company; Independent Telephone Andtelecommunications Alliance, Intervenors on Appeal, v. Federal Communications Commission; United States of America,respondents,american Telephone and Telegraph Company;telecommunications Resellers Association; Mcitelecommunications Corporation; Lbc Communications, Inc.;worldcom, Inc.; Competitive Telecommunications Association,intervenors on Appeal.us West, Inc., Petitioner,southwestern Bell Telephone Company, Intervenor on Appeal,ameritech Corporation; Time Warner Communications Holdings,inc.; Us Telephone Association; Ameritech Corporation;time Warner Communications Holdings, Inc.; Association Forlocal Tele-communications Services; Gte Servicecorporation; Gte Alaska, Incorporated; Gte Arkansas,incorporated; Gte California, Incorporated; Gte Florida,incorporated; Gte Midwest, Incorporated; Gte Southwest,incorporated; Gte South, Incorporated; Gte North,incorporated; Gte Northwest, Incorporated; Gte Hawaiiantelephone Company, Incorporated; Gte West Coast,incorporated; Contel of Minnesota, Inc.; Contel of Thesouth, Inc.; Bell Atlantic-washington, D.c., Inc.; Bellatlantic-west Virginia, Inc.; Bell Atlantic-new Jersey,inc.; Bell Atlantic-maryland, Inc.; Bellatlantic-delaware, Inc.; Bell Atlantic-pennsylvania, Inc.;bell Atlantic-virginia, Inc.; New York Telephone Company;new England Telephone and Telegraph Company; Independenttelephone and Telecommunications Alliance, Intervenors on Appeal, v. Federal Communications Commission; United States of America,respondents,american Telephone and Telegraph Company;telecommunications Resellers Association; Mcitelecommunications Corporation; Lbc Communications, Inc.;worldcom, Inc.; Competitive Telecommunications Association,intervenors on Appeal.ameritech Corporation, Petitioner,time Warner Communications Holdings, Inc.; Us Telephoneassociation; Association for Local Telecommunicationsservices; Southwestern Bell Telephone Company; Gte Servicecorporation; Gte Alaska, Incorporated; Gte Arkansas,incorporated; Gte California, Incorporated; Gte Florida,incorporated; Gte Midwest, Incorporated; Gte South,incorporated; Gte Southwest, Incorporated; Gte North,incorporated; Gte Northwest, Incorporated; Gte Hawaiiantelephone Company, Incorporated; Gte West Coast,incorporated; Contel of Minnesota, Inc.; Contel of Thesouth, Inc.; Bell Atlantic-washington, D.c., Inc.; Bellatlantic-west Virginia, Inc.; Bell Atlantic-new Jersey,inc.; Bell Atlantic-maryland, Inc.; Bellatlantic-delaware, Inc.; Bell Atlantic-pennsylvania, Inc.;bell Atlantic-virginia, Inc.; New York Telephone Company;new England Telephone and Telegraph Company; Independenttelephone and Telecommunications Alliance, Intervenors on Appeal, v. Federal Communications Commission; United States of America,respondents,american Telephone and Telegraph Company;telecommunications Resellers Association; Mcitele-communications Corporation; Lbc Communications, Inc.;worldcom, Inc.; Competitive Telecommunications Association,intervenors on Appeal,southern New England Telephone Company, Petitioner,independent Telephone and Tele-communications Alliance;ameritech Corporation; Time Warner Communications Holdings,inc.; Us Telephone Association; Association for Localtelecommunicatio
Citation: 153 F.3d 597
Court: 8th Circuit Court of Appeals
Date: December 4, 1998
Minnesota Milk Producers Association, a Non-profit Minnesotacorporation, Individually, on Behalf of Themselves Andothers Similarly Situated; Bill Dropik, Individually, Onbehalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated; Chesterkolstad, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Otherssimilarly Situated; Greg Radermacher, Individually, Onbehalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated; Arnoldness, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Otherssimilarly Situated; Fredrick J. Bianchi, Individually, Onbehalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated; Marlonrestad, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Otherssimilarly Situated; Delbert Mandelko, Individually, Onbehalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated; Johnfischer, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Otherssimilarly Situated; Lee Johnston, Individually, on Behalfof Himself and Others Similarly Situated; Leslie Kyllo,individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarlysituated; James Muzzy, Individually, on Behalf of Himselfand Others Similarly Situated, Appellees/cross-appellants, v. Dan Glickman, Secretary, United States Department Ofagriculture, Appellant/cross-appellee.minnesota Milk Producers Association, a Non-profit Minnesotacorporation, Individually, on Behalf of Themselves Andothers Similarly Situated; Bill Dropik, Individually, Onbehalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated; Chesterkolstad, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Otherssimilarly Situated; Greg Radermacher, Individually, Onbehalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated; Arnoldness, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Otherssimilarly Situated; Fredrick J. Bianchi, Individually, Onbehalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated; Marlonrestad, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Otherssimilarly Situated; Delbert Mandelko, Individually, Onbehalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated; Johnfischer, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Otherssimilarly Situated; Lee Johnston, Individually, on Behalfof Himself and Others Similarly Situated; Leslie Kyllo,individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarlysituated; James Muzzy, Individually, on Behalf of Himselfand Others Similarly Situated, Appellees, v. Southeast Dairy Farmers Association; and United Dairymen Ofarizona, Appellants.minnesota Milk Producers Association, a Non-profit Minnesotacorporation, Individually, on Behalf of Themselves Andothers Similarly Situated; Bill Dropik, Individually, Onbehalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated; Chesterkolstad, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Otherssimilarly Situated; Greg Radermacher, Individually, Onbehalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated; Arnoldness, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Otherssimilarly Situated; Fredrick J. Bianchi, Individually, Onbehalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated; Marlonrestad, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Otherssimilarly Situated; Delbert Mandelko, Individually, Onbehalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated; Johnfischer, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Otherssimilarly Situated; Lee Johnston, Individually, on Behalfof Himself and Others Similarly Situated; Leslie Kyllo,individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarlysituated; James Muzzy, Individually, on Behalf of Himselfand Others Similarly Situated, Appellees, v. National Farmers Organization ("nfo"), Appellant.minnesota Milk Producers Association, a Non-profit Minnesotacorporation, Individually, on Behalf of Themselves Andothers Similarly Situated; Bill Dropik, Individually, Onbehalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated; Chesterkolstad, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Otherssimilarly Situated; Greg Radermacher, Individually, Onbehalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated; Arnoldness, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Otherssimilarly Situated; Fredrick J. Bianchi, Individually, Onbehalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated; Marlonrestad, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Otherssimilarly Situated; Delbert Mandelko, Individually, Onbehalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated; Johnfischer, Individually, on Behalf of Himself
Citation: 153 F.3d 632
Court: 8th Circuit Court of Appeals
Date: August 13, 1998
Citation: 153 F.3d 681
Court: 8th Circuit Court of Appeals
Date: August 17, 1998
Jerome T. Redman; Bruce M. Rannow; Eric M. Newman; Waynec. Mapes; Glenn R. Minkel, on Behalf Ofthemselves and Other Employees Similarlysituated; Michael Acton;robert Algar; Plaintiffs;john Apling; Plaintiff-appellant;douglas Ardoff; Terrell Backensto; William W. Baggett;rick Baker; Gary L. Barney; Ron Bawdon; Roger H. Beau;harlan Bedford; Jon Bell; Michael Biernacki; Allen V.boben; David Brown; Plaintiffs;j. Allen Brown; Plaintiff-appellant;david J. Budin; Judith A. Cabral; Joseph P. Casey; Johns. Clare; Thompson Cofer; Frank P. Comito; Jamescornelinson; Lyle G. Dallman; Robert Dandurand; Larrydavis; Louis E. Deschenes; William M. Deyeager; Michaeldoner; James E. Doughan; John Downing; Gedeminas Drazdys;kenneth Driver; Jay R. Duncan; William Eakins; Robertedwards; Kent W. Emery; John Fuxa; Adrian G. Garcia;anthony M. Greco; Daniel L. Greer; Plaintiffs;steve Grigsby; Paul J. Gryczanowski; Plaintiffs-appellants;larry Hackett; Daniel M. Hagman; James M. Hamilton; Dalehanna; Ronald Hartford; Plaintiffs;alan Heel; Plaintiff-appellant;albert Herman; Ronald Herman; C.j. Hills; Charles D.hise; Terry Holdaway; George Hookstra; Richardu. Jacobs; Lane W. Jarvis; Vagnjensen; Dennis Jones; Plaintiffs;ronald B. Jones; Plaintiff-appellant;gerold Kargel; Kenneth Keiper; James E. Keith; Bruce J.kelly; Edward M. Knebel; Michael D. Koch;william Kolts; Plaintiffs;david Krenz; Plaintiff-appellant;bernadette Kubalsky; Michael N. Lamitina; Jory P. Lane;paul Langston; Ida Mae Lauer; Bobby Lawrence; Williamlee; Gary Leners; Steven Leuthold; Edward A. Lewis, Ii;gerald K. Lucas; Robert C. Lutchendorf; Woody Maloney;john Manship; Larry Manzanares; Anthony Martinez; Roy A.mcconnell; J. Scott Mckindley; Richard O. Mesecher;arnold Miller; Robert F. Montag; Wesley D. Moody; Petemorris; Kent Nicholas; Michael O'leary; Jess Page; Plaintiffs;floyd Paulson; Plaintiff-appellant;mary Kay Pence; Jon F. Peterka; Charles T. Peterson; Alanr. Pierce; Linda Prespentt; Plaintiffs;w.a. Prostrollo; Plaintiff-appellant;roy Reed; F. Joe Ressler; Michael Robertson; Kennethroeh; Curtis Root; Robert Rosinski; Gary Sagers; Jamesa. Schloer; Donald Scoby; Jerry R. Scott; Robertseedroff; Frederick Seward; David Shepard; Rick Simpson;edward Sparks; Fred Spaulding; Robert Stevens; Jessestewart; Russell Stewart; Merle J. Suckie; Anthonyswanson; David Tadlock; Thomas Thompson; Robert Totten;leroy Valdez; Danny Van Vickle; Rene E. Vogel; Eugenewalcker; Mark Wenberg; Ed Westmoreland; J. Gregorywheeler; David F. Williams; Jerry Williams; Jim Williams;leslie Williams; Gregory B. Wilson; Nickey Jean Wilson;john Woodward; F. Dale Youmans; Gordon Zimmerman; Plaintiffs; v. U.S. West Business Resources, Inc.; Defendant-appellee
Citation: 153 F.3d 691
Court: 8th Circuit Court of Appeals
Date: August 18, 1998
Citation: 153 F.3d 714
Court: 8th Circuit Court of Appeals
Date: August 20, 1998
Citation: 153 F.3d 727
Court: 10th Circuit Court of Appeals
Date: July 24, 1998
Citation: 153 F.3d 96
Court: 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals
Date: July 24, 1998