United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Walter Barnes, Defendant-appellant, 145 F.3d 1341 (9th Cir. 1998)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Ronald M. Whyte, District Judge, Presiding.
Before BRUNETTI, RYMER and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM*
Defendant Walter Barnes appeals from his jury conviction and sentence for conspiracy to import heroin into the United States in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 952 and for importation of heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 953. Barnes was sentenced to 262 months of imprisonment. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742 and 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.
The only question on appeal is whether Barnes' conviction was tainted by ineffective assistance of counsel. These claims are ordinarily brought in collateral habeas proceedings, and "this Court has been chary of analyzing insufficiency of counsel claims on direct appeal." United States v. Schaflander, 743 F.2d 714, 717 (9th Cir. 1984). The reason for this rule is that a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel usually "cannot be advanced without the development of facts outside the original record." United States v. Wagner, 834 F.2d 1474, 1462 (9th Cir. 1987) (quoting United States v. Birges, 723 F.2d 666, 670 (9th Cir. 1984)).
We decline to reach, or express an opinion on, the merits of Barnes' claim, and our judgment is entered without prejudice to collateral proceedings.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.