Dwight Theodore Beazley, by & Through His Guardian Ad Litemdwight T. Beazley; Jenelle D'anne Beazley, by &through Her Guardian Ad Litem Dwight T.beazley, Plaintiffs-appellants, v. California Superior Court; Daniel J. Didier; Myron S. Brown;orange County; Michael R. Capizzi; Jan C. Sturla; Suedelarue, Jerri Lynn Church; James G Aumond; Maurice L.evans; Martha G. Gutierrez; Cameron J. Talley; Jake Brower;kimberly Strang; Thomas E. Mccool; Lisa Odeh, Defendant-appellee, 145 F.3d 1336 (9th Cir. 1998)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Gary L. Taylor, District Judge, Presiding.
Before SCHROEDER, TROTT, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM*
Dwight Theodore appeals pro se from the district court's order dismissing on jurisdictional grounds his action brought under 42 U.S .C. § 1983 seeking to enjoin the enforcement of allegedly erroneous child support orders issued by the Superior Court for the County of Orange. We have reviewed the record and affirm for the reasons set forth in the district court's decision and order of February 18, 1997, dismissing the action for lack of jurisdiction.1
AFFIRMED.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3
Beazley's requests for judicial notice and the granting of a certificate of probable cause are denied
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
