United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Arnold Robert Chasteen, Defendant-appellant, 142 F.3d 446 (9th Cir. 1998)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 142 F.3d 446 (9th Cir. 1998) Submitted April 20, 1998. **Decided April 23, 1998

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Robert C. Broomfield, District Judge, Presiding.

Before BRUNETTI, RYMER and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM^*

Arnold Robert Chasteen appeals the sentence imposed by the district court on remand from this court for resentencing for his methamphetamine conviction. His attorney has filed a brief stating that he can identify no issues for review, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our examination of counsel's brief, Chasteen's supplemental pro se brief, and our independent review of the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S. Ct. 346, 102 L. Ed. 2d 300 (1988), disclose no issues for review.

Accordingly, we grant counsel's motion to withdraw and affirm the district court's judgment.

AFFIRMED.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.