United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Paul Aduluije Aghaji, Defendant-appellant, 142 F.3d 445 (9th Cir. 1998)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 142 F.3d 445 (9th Cir. 1998) .Submitted April 20, 1998. **Decided April 24, 1998

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, James M. Ideman, District Judge, Presiding.

Before BRUNETTI, RYMER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM* 

Paul Aduluije Aghaji appeals the sentence imposed following remand from this court for resentencing for his guilty plea conviction for two counts of conspiracy to import heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 963 and 952(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and affirm.

Aghaji contends that the district court erred by imposing a fine as part of his sentence. On November 20, 1996, a panel of this court decided this very issue on the merits in Aghaji's original appeal, and Aghaji advances no arguments which compel us to reconsider the prior decision. See United States v. Schaff, 948 F.2d 501, 506 (9th Cir. 1991); United States v. Houser, 804 F.2d 565, 567-68 (9th Cir. 1986). Thus, law of the case precludes our re-examination of the issue. See Schaff, 948 F.2d at 506; Houser, 804 F.2d at 567-68.

AFFIRMED.

 **

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 *

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.