David L. Rose, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Coca-cola Bottling Company Consolidated, Defendant-appellee, 14 F.3d 596 (4th Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte.
David L. Rose, appellant Pro Se.
W.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before PHILLIPS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM
OPINION
David L. Rose appeals from the district court's order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1988), dismissing his appeal of the North Carolina Employment Security Commission's decision denying him benefits. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses no abuse of discretion and that this appeal is without merit.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court's decision. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.*
AFFIRMED
Appellant's motion to expedite is now moot and is dismissed for that reason
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
