Wiley G. Ouzts, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Warden, Central Correctional Institution; Wayne T. Rodgers;john D. Lisotto; Larry A. Benbow; Mark A.hudson, Correctional Officer; Ronald W.adams, Defendants-appellees, 14 F.3d 595 (4th Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina.
Wiley G. Ouzts, pro se.
William Henry Davidson, II, Andrew Frederick Lindemann, Columbia, SC; Barbara Murcier Bowens, Columbia, SC
D.S.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ouzts v. Warden, No. CA-90-1348-3-21 (D.S.C. June 3, 1992; June 28, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
