Notice: Eighth Circuit Rule 28a(k) Governs Citation of Unpublished Opinions and Provides That They Are Not Precedent and Generally Should Not Be Cited Unless Relevant to Establishing the Doctrines of Res Judicata, Collateral Estoppel, the Law of the Case, or if the Opinion Has Persuasive Value on a Material Issue and No Published Opinion Would Serve As Well.howard Wayne Jones, Appellant, v. Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Appellee, 133 F.3d 922 (8th Cir. 1998)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit - 133 F.3d 922 (8th Cir. 1998) Submitted Jan. 22, 1998. Filed Feb. 3, 1998

Before FAGG, BRIGHT, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.


The court grants Howard Wayne Jones a certificate of appealability allowing an appeal from the district court's denial of Jones's fourth petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Because Jones attacks the execution of his state sentence, we consider Jones's petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. In our view, briefing by the parties will serve no useful purpose and we now turn to the merits of Jones's appeal. Having considered the record, we conclude Jones's contention that he is eligible for parole notwithstanding three earlier felony convictions when he pleaded guilty in 1979 is without merit. See Schwindling v. Smith, 777 F.2d 431, 432-33 (8th Cir. 1985); Watson v. State, 609 S.W.2d 673, 674 (Ark.Ct.App.1980). Even if we consider Jones's petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, we would reject his appeal because the district court correctly dismissed his petition for abuse of the writ.

We thus deny Jones's motion for appointment of counsel and affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.