United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Marino Camacho-cibrian, Defendant-appellant, 131 F.3d 149 (9th Cir. 1997)

 Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 131 F.3d 149 (9th Cir. 1997) Submitted November 17, 1997. **Filed Nov. 21, 1997

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, D.C. Nos. CV-97-06044-MRH, CR-95-60062-MRH; Michael R. Hogan, Chief Judge, Presiding.

Before HUG, Chief Judge, PREGERSON and BEEZER, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM* 

Marino Camacho-Cibrian appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's order filed July 2, 1997. We agree with the district court that Damacho-Cibrian's waiver of the right to file a section 2255 motion is valid.1 

AFFIRMED.

 **

The panel unaminously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 *

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

 1

Camacho-Cibrian's request for oral argument and motion for appointment of cousnel are denied

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.