Raymond Milton Williams, Plaintiff-appellant, v. K.w. Prunty, Warden; H.w. Wilming; v. Miles, Correctionalofficer, Defendants-appellees, 129 F.3d 129 (9th Cir. 1997)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 129 F.3d 129 (9th Cir. 1997) Submitted Nov. 4, 1997. **Decided Nov. 7, 1997

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, No. CV-95-01560-JSR; John S. Rhoades, District Judge, Presiding.

Before: HUG, Chief Judge, PREGERSON, and BEEZER, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM* 

Raymond Milton Williams, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of prison officials ("defendants") in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that defendants violated his civil rights by failing to protect him from a stabbing attack by other prisoners. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

Williams contends that there is a genuine issue of material fact with respect to his Eighth Amendment, due process and equal protection claims. Williams and defendants presented opposing affidavits which raise material issues of fact that cannot be resolved on summary judgment. See Berg v. Kincheloe, 794 F.2d 457, 459 (9th Cir. 1986). Accordingly, we reverse the district court's grant of summary judgment and remand to the district court for further proceedings.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.


 **

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4. Accordingly, appellant's request for oral argument is denied

 *

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.