United States of America, Plaintiff/appellee, v. Lorenzo F. Mcgill, Defendant/appellant, 129 F.3d 128 (9th Cir. 1997)

 Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 129 F.3d 128 (9th Cir. 1997) Submitted Sept. 9, 1997. 2Decided Oct. 29, 1997

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, No. CR-93-0283-T; Howard B. Turrentine, District Judge, Presiding.

Before: PREGERSON and HAWKINS Circuit Judges, and WEINER,3  Senior District Judge.

ORDER1 

Because McGill cannot meet the requirements of United States v. Armstrong, 517 U.S. 456, 116 S. Ct. 1480, 1487 (1996), his selective prosecution/selective enforcement arguments are of no avail. Because our prior mandate cannot be construed as a new trial grant, there is no Speedy Trial Act violation.

AFFIRMED.

 2

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); Ninth Circuit Rule 34-4

 3

Charles R. Weiner, Senior United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation

 1

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.