United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Saul Pedraza-murillo, Defendant-appellant, 122 F.3d 1075 (9th Cir. 1997)

 Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 122 F.3d 1075 (9th Cir. 1997) Submitted Aug. 25, 1997. **Decided Aug. 28, 1997

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California William J. Rea, District Judge, Presiding

Before: SCHROEDER, FERNANDEZ and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM* 

Saul Pedraza-Murillo appeals his jury trial conviction and the sixty-three month sentence imposed for illegal reentry by a previously deported felon in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. His attorney has filed a brief stating that he finds no issues for review and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our examination of counsel's brief and our independent review of the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988), disclose no issues for review.

Accordingly, we grant counsel's motion to withdraw and affirm the district court's judgment.

AFFIRMED.

 **

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4

 *

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.