United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Glenn Paul Robinson, Defendant-appellant,andsamuel Cedric Brown, Defendant, 12 F.3d 206 (4th Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Glenn Paul Robinson, Appellant Pro Se.
Gary Patrick Jordan, United States Attorney, for Appellee.
D. Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for a reduction in sentence or a transfer to home confinement. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* United States v. Robinson, No. CR-73-531-HM (D. Md. July 12, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Because Robinson failed to bring his motion within 120 days of sentencing, the district court lacked authority to consider the claim under the old version of Fed. R. Crim. P. 35
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
