Jimmy Lee Mays, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Doctor Berdeen; Major Mcmillan; Alvin W. Hudson;lieutenant Brooks; Donald R. Stern,defendants-appellees,andcommonwealth of Virginia, Defendant, 12 F.3d 205 (4th Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
Jimmy Lee Mays, Appellant Pro Se.
William Fain Rutherford, Jr., Elizabeth Kay Dillon, Kevin Scott Blair, WOODS, ROGERS & HAZLEGROVE; Leigh Thompson Hanes, George W. Wooten, Frances Merrimon Burwell, WOOTEN & HART, P.C., for Appellees.
W.D. Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before PHILLIPS, WILKINS, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Jimmy Lee Mays appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.* Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Mays v. Virginia, No. CA-92-643-R (W.D. Va. June 10, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Because this appeal does not present a substantial or complex issue, Mays's motion for appointment of counsel is denied
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
