United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Arturo Durazo, Defendant-appellant,, 12 F.3d 1109 (9th Cir. 1993)

 Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 12 F.3d 1109 (9th Cir. 1993) Submitted Nov. 17, 1993. *Decided Dec. 6, 1993

Before: SCHROEDER, D.W. NELSON, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM** 

Arturo Durazo appeals his conviction and sentence, following a jury trial, for possession with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a) (1). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Durazo's attorney has filed a brief stating that he finds no issues for review. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988), discloses no issues for review.

We AFFIRM the district court's judgment and GRANT the motion of Jeffrey G. Buchella, Esq., to withdraw as counsel of record.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.