Application of Carl Philips, Petitioner-appellant, v. Newell Co., Respondent-appellee, 118 F.3d 972 (2d Cir. 1997)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from a judgment by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York; Peter K. Leisure, Judge.
Ronald J. Offenkrantz, New York City (Michael H. Smith, of counsel), for Petitioner-Appellant.
Barry S. Alberts, New York City (Robert J. Hoskins, Paul Scrudato, of counsel), for Respondent-Appellee.
Before: WINTER, Chief Judge, JACOBS and LEVAL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from Judge Leisure's denial of a petition to stay arbitration. We affirm for the reasons set forth in his opinion. Application of Carl Philips v. Newell Co., No. 96 CIV. 9153, 1997 WL 181191 (S.D.N.Y. April 15, 1997). The contentions raised by the appellant for the first time on appeal are without merit.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
