Larry Aldoff, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Art Weidemann, Assistant District Attorney; Ellen Wadley,investigator; Earl Hartley and Marilyn Aldoff, Intheir Official and Individualcapacities, Defendants-appellees.andclinton Pitts, in His Official and Individual Capacity, Defendant, 113 F.3d 1245 (10th Cir. 1997)
Annotate this CaseBefore SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, PORFILIO and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
ORDER AND JUDGMENT*
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Plaintiff Larry Aldoff appeals from the district court's sua sponte dismissal of his complaint against the various named defendants. We have carefully reviewed the record in light of the issues Mr. Aldoff raises on appeal. We are not persuaded that the district court erred in dismissing the complaint. We grant Mr. Aldoff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, and we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court substantially for the reasons set forth in the court's Memorandum Opinion filed September 6, 1996.
This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
