Notice: Eighth Circuit Rule 28a(k) Governs Citation of Unpublished Opinions and Provides That They Are Not Precedent and Generally Should Not Be Cited Unless Relevant to Establishing the Doctrines of Res Judicata, Collateral Estoppel, the Law of the Case, or if the Opinion Has Persuasive Value on a Material Issue and No Published Opinion Would Serve As Well.john Kittel; Karen Kittel, Appellants, v. Dayton Hudson Corporation, Appellee, 108 F.3d 1382 (8th Cir. 1997)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit - 108 F.3d 1382 (8th Cir. 1997) Submitted: Feb. 13, 1997Filed: March 5, 1997

Before McMILLIAN, JOHN R. GIBSON, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.


John Kittel and Karen Kittel appeal the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Dayton Hudson Corporation. The district court granted summary judgment because John Kittel did not meet his employer's requirement that he be at work on the day the benefits were scheduled to commence or any time afterwards, the enrollment forms he signed clearly stated the terms of the benefits, and his Family Medical Leave Act claim failed because he did not work for his employer for twelve months. Having considered the record and the parties' briefs, we are satisfied the district court's judgment was correct and further discussion is not warranted. We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.