Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.united States of America, Plaintiff--appellee, v. Curtis Woodrow Jones, Defendant--appellant, 108 F.3d 1374 (4th Cir. 1997)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 108 F.3d 1374 (4th Cir. 1997) Submitted Feb. 27, 1997. Decided March 10, 1997

Curtis Woodrow Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Joseph Hulkower, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Appellant's motion to proceed on the original record, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Jones, Nos. CR-93-75-A; CA96-158-AM (E.D. Va. Apr. 9, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.